EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 46 / No 3 (2010) Ann. Limnol. - Int. J. Lim., 46 3 (2010) 149-156 References
Free Access
Issue
Ann. Limnol. - Int. J. Lim.
Volume 46, Number 3, 2010
Page(s) 149 - 156
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/limn/2010019
Published online 16 August 2010
  • Alba-Tercedor J., 1996. Macroinvertebrados acuáticos y calidad de las aguas de los ríos, IV Simposio del Agua en Andalucía (SIAGA). Almaeria, 2, 203–213. [Google Scholar]
  • Allan J.D., 2004. The influence of land use on stream ecosystems. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Sys., 35, 257–284. [Google Scholar]
  • Boyero L., Ramirez A., Dudgeon D. and Pearson R.G., 2009. Are tropical streams really different? J. N. Amer. Benthol. Soc., 28, 397–403. [Google Scholar]
  • Connolly N. and Pearson R.G., 2007. The effect of fine sedimentation on tropical stream macroinvertebrate assemblages: a comparison using flow-through artificial stream channels and recirculating mesocosms. Hydrobiologia, 592, 423–438. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Connolly N.M., Pearson B.A. and Pearson R.G., 2007. Macroinvertebrates as indicators of ecosystem health in Wet Tropics streams. In: Arthington A.H. and Pearson R.G. (eds.), Biological Indicators of Ecosystem health in Wet Tropics Streams, Final Report Task 3 Catchment to Reef Research Program Cooperative Research Centre for Rainforest Ecology & Management and Cooperative Research Centre for the Great Barrier Reef World Heritage Área, 129–176. [Google Scholar]
  • Couceiro S.R., Hamada N., Luz S.L., Forsberg B.R. and Pimentel T.P., 2007. Deforestation and sewage effects on aquatic macroinvertebrates in urban streams in Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil. Hydrobiologia, 575, 271–284. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Dudgeon D., 2006. The impacts of human disturbance on stream benthic invertebrates and their drift in North Sulawesi, Indonesia. Freshwat. Biol., 51, 1710–1729. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Eaton A.D., Clesceri L.S. and Greenberg A.E., 1995. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 19th edn., American Public Health Association, Washington DC, 1000 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Empresa de Transmisión Eléctrica S.A., 2008. Registros diarios de temperaturas y humedad relativa de la estación de Antón, Panamá, http://www.hidromet.com.pa/sp/InicioFrm.htm. [Google Scholar]
  • Helson J.E., Williams D. and Turner D., 2006. Larval chironomid community organization in four tropical rivers: human impacts and longitudinal zonation. Hydrobiologia, 559, 413–431. [Google Scholar]
  • Hynes H.B.N., 1960. The biology of polluted waters, Liverpool University Press, Liverpool. [Google Scholar]
  • Margalef R., 1983. Limnologia, Omega, Barcelona, 1010 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Matagi S.V., 1996. The effect of pollution on benthic macroinvertebrates in a Ugandan stream. Arch. Hydrobiol., 137, 537–549. [Google Scholar]
  • McCune B. and Mefford M.J., 2006. PC-ORD. Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data, Version 5.10, MjM Software, Gleneden Beach. [Google Scholar]
  • Merrit R.W. and Cummins K.W., 1996. An introduction to the aquatic insects of North America, Kendall/Hunt Publication, Dubuque, 862 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Moulton T.P. and Wantzen K.M., 2006. Conservation of tropical streams special questions or conventional paradigms? Aquat. Conserv., 16, 659–663. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ndaruga A., Ndiritu G., Gichuki N. and Wamicha W.N., 2004. Impact of water quality on macroinvertebrate assemblages along a tropical stream in Kenya. African J. Ecol., 42, 208–216. [Google Scholar]
  • Pascoal C., Cassio F. and Gomes P., 2001. Leaf breakdown rates: a measure of water quality? Int. Rev. Hydrobiol., 86, 407–416. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pearson R.G. and Penridge L.K., 1987. The effects of pollution by organic sugar mill effluent on the macro-invertebrates of a stream in tropical Queensland, Australia. J. Environ. Manag., 24, 205–215. [Google Scholar]
  • Posada J., Roldan G. and Ramirez J., 2000. Caracterización fisicoquímica y biológica de la calidad de aguas en la cuenca Piedras Blancas, Antioquia, Colombia. Rev. Biol. Trop., 48, 59–70. [Google Scholar]
  • Pringle C.M., Scatena F.N., Paaby-Hansen P. and Nuñez-Ferrera M., 2000. River conservation in Latin America and the Caribbean. In: Boon P.J., Davies B.R. and Petts G.E. (eds.), Global Perspectives on River Conservation: Policy and Practice, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 41–77. [Google Scholar]
  • Ramirez A. and Pringle C., 2001. Spatial and temporal patterns of invertebrate drift in streams draining a Neotropical landscape. Freshwat. Biol., 46, 47–62. [Google Scholar]
  • Roldán G., 1988. Guía para el estudio de los macroinvertebrados acuáticos del Departamento de Antioquia, Fondo FEN, Medellín, 217 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Rosenberg D.M. and Resh V.H., 1993. Freshwater biomonitoring and benthic macroinvertebrates, Chapman and Hall publishers, New York, 488 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Springer M., Hanson P. and Ramirez A. (eds.), 2010. Macroinvertebrados de Agua Dulce de Costa Rica I. Rev. Biol. Trop., 58, Suppl. 3. [Google Scholar]
  • Thorne R. and Williams W., 1997. The response of benthic macroinvertebrates to pollution in developing countries: a multimetric system of bioassessment. Freshwat. Biol., 37, 671–686. [Google Scholar]
  • Vannote R.L., Minshall G.W., Cummins K.W., Sedell J.R. and Cushing C.E., 1980. The river continuum concept. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 37, 130–137. [Google Scholar]
  • Wantzen K.M., Ramirez A. and Winemimller K.O., 2006. New vistas in Neotropical stream ecology – Preface. J. N. Amer. Benthol. Soc., 25, 61–65. [Google Scholar]
  • Yule C.M., Boyero L. and Marchant R., 2010. Effects of sediment pollution on food webs in a tropical river (Borneo, Indonesia). Mar. Freshwat. Res., 61, 204–213. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.