EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 45 / No 1 (2009) Ann. Limnol. - Int. J. Lim., 45 1 (2009) 29-39 References
Free Access
Issue
Ann. Limnol. - Int. J. Lim.
Volume 45, Number 1, 2009
Page(s) 29 - 39
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/limn/09005
Published online 03 April 2009
  • Barbour M.T., Gerritsen J., Snyder B.D. and Stribling J.B., 1999. Rapid bioassessment protocols for use in streams and wadeable rivers: periphyton, benthic macroinvertebrates and fish, EPA 841-B-99-002, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, Washington, D.C. [Google Scholar]
  • Bataille K.J. and Baldassarre G.A., 1993. Distribution and abundance of aquatic macroinvertebrates following drought in three prairie pothole wetlands. Wetlands, 13, 260-269. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Batzer D.P., Palik B.J. and Buech R., 2004. Relationships between environmental characteristics and macroinvertebrate communities in seasonal woodland ponds of Minnesota. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc., 23, 50-68. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bazzanti M. and Della Bella V., 2004. Functional feeding and habit organization of macroinvertebrate communities in permanent and temporary ponds in Central Italy. J. Freshwat. Ecol., 19, 493-497. [Google Scholar]
  • Bazzanti M., Baldoni S. and Seminara M., 1996. Invertebrate macrofauna of a temporary ponds in Central Italy: composition, community parameters and temporal succession. Arch. Hydrobiol., 137, 77-94. [Google Scholar]
  • Bazzanti M., Seminara M., Baldoni S. and Stella A., 2000. Macroinvertebrates and environmental factors of some temporary and permanent ponds in Italy. Verh. Internat. Verein. Limnol., 27, 936-941. [Google Scholar]
  • Bazzanti M., Della Bella V. and Seminara M., 2003. Factors affecting macroinvertebrate communities in astatic ponds in central Italy. J. Freshwat. Ecol., 18, 537-548. [Google Scholar]
  • Bazzanti M., Grezzi F. and Della Bella V., 2008. Chironomids (Diptera) of temporary and permanent ponds in Central Italy: a neglected invertebrate group in pond ecology and conservation. J. Freshwat. Ecol., 23, 219-229. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Beckett D.C., Aartila T.P. and Miller A.C., 1992. Contrast in density of benthic invertebrates between macrophyte beds and open littoral patches in Eau Galle Lake, Wisconsin. Am. Midl. Nat., 127, 77-90. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Biggs J., Corfield A., Walker D., Whitfield M. and Williams P., 1994. New approaches to the management of ponds. British Wildlife, 5, 273-287. [Google Scholar]
  • Bremner J.M., 1965. Total nitrogen. In: Black C.A. (ed.), Method of soil analysis, American Society of Agronomy: Madison, WI, 1149-1178. [Google Scholar]
  • Brönmark C., 1985. Freshwater snail diversity: effects of pond area, habitat heterogeneity and isolation. Oecologia, 67, 127-131. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Carpenter S.R., Elser J.J. and Olson K.M., 1983. Effects of roots of Myriophyllum verticillatum L. on sediment redox conditions. Aquat. Bot., 17, 243-249. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Clarke K.R. and Warwick R.M., 1994. Change in marine communities: an approach to statistical analysis and interpretation, Natural Environment Research Council, UK. [Google Scholar]
  • Collinson N.H., Biggs J., Corfield A., Hodson M.J., Walker D., Whitfield M. and Williams P.J., 1995. Temporary and permanent ponds: an assessment of the effects of drying out on the conservation value of aquatic macroinvertebrate communities. Biol. Conserv., 74, 125-133. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Crowder L.D. and Cooper W.E., 1982. Habitat structural complexity and the interaction between bluegills and their prey. Ecology, 63, 1802-1813. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Culioli J.L., Foata J., Mori C., Orsini A. and Marchand B., 2006. Temporal succession of the macroinvertebrate fauna in a Corsican temporary pond. Vie Milieu, 56, 215-221. [Google Scholar]
  • Cummins K.W., 1962. An evaluation of some technique for the collection and analysis of benthic sample with special emphasis on lotic water. Am. Midl. Nat., 67, 447-504. [Google Scholar]
  • Cummins K.W. and Wilzbach M.A., 1985. Field procedures for analysis of functional feeding groups of stream invertebrates, Appalachian Environmental Laboratory, Maryland, Frostburg, Contr. n° 1611. [Google Scholar]
  • De Meester L., Declerck S., Stoks R., Louette G., van De Meutter F., De Bie T., Michels E. and Brendonck L., 2005. Ponds and pools as model systems in conservation biology, ecology and evolutionary biology. Aquat. Conserv. Mar. Freshwat. Ecosyst., 15, 715-725. [Google Scholar]
  • Della Bella V., Bazzanti M. and Chiarotti F., 2005. Macroinvertebrate diversity and conservation status of Mediterranean ponds in Italy: water permanence and mesohabitat influence. Aquat. Conserv. Mar. Freshwat. Ecosyst., 15, 583-600. [Google Scholar]
  • Della Bella V., Bazzanti M. and Grezzi F., 2006. Il ruolo della Riserva Presidenziale di Castelporziano nella conservazione dei macroinvertebrati delle piccole raccolte d'acqua lentiche del litorale tirrenico nei pressi di Roma. In: Accademia Nazionale delle Scienze detta Dei Quaranta. (ed.), Il sistema ambientale della Tenuta Presidenziale di Castelporziano, Ricerche sulla complessità di un ecosistema forestale costiero mediterraneo, Seconda serie. “Scritti e documenti”, XXXVII, 703-723. [Google Scholar]
  • Della Bella V., Puccinelli C., Marcheggiani S. and Mancini L., 2007. Benthic diatom communities and their relationship to water chemistry in wetlands of Central Italy. Ann. Limnol. - Int. J. Lim., 43, 89-99. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Della Bella V., Bazzanti M., Dowgiallo M.G. and Iberite M., 2008. Macrophyte diversity and physico-chemical characteristics of Tyrrhenian coast ponds in central Italy: implications for conservation. Hydrobiologia, 597, 85-95. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Díaz S. and Cabido M., 2001. Viva la difference: plant functional diversity matters to ecosystem process. Trends Ecol. Evol., 16, 646-55. [Google Scholar]
  • Diehl S. and Kornijòw R., 1998. Influence of submerged macrophytes on trophic interaction among fish and macroinvertebrates. In: Jeppesen E., Søndergaard Ma., Søndergaard Mo. and Christoffersen K. (eds.), The structuring role of submerged macrophytes in lakes, Springer, New York, 24-46. [Google Scholar]
  • Dvořak J., 1996. An example of relationships between macrophytes, macroinvertebrates and their food resources in a shallow eutrophic lake. Hydrobiologia, 339, 27-36. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Dvořak J. and Best E.P.H., 1982. Macro-invertebrate communities associated with the macrophytes of Lake Vechten: structural and functional relationships. Hydrobiologia, 95, 115-126. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • E.P.C.N., 2007. Developing the Pond Manifesto. Ann. Limnol. - Int. J. Lim., 43, 221-232. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Gascon S., Boix D., Sala J. and Quintana X.D., 2008. Relation between macroinvertebrate life trategies and habitat traits in Mediterranean salt marsh ponds (Emporda' wetlands, NE Iberian Peninsula). Hydrobiologia, 597, 71-83. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gaudette H.E., Flight W.R., Toner L. and Folger D.W., 1974. An inexpensive titration method of the determination of organic carbon in recent sediments. J. Sedim. Petrol., 44, 249-253. [Google Scholar]
  • Harper D., Mekotova J., Hulme S., White J. and Hall J., 1997. Habitat heterogeneity and aquatic invertebrate diversity in floodplain forests. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. Lett., 6, 275-285. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Heino J., 2000. Lentic macroinvertebrate assemblage structure along gradients in spatial heterogeneity, habitat size and water chemistry. Hydrobiologia, 418, 229-242. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Heino J., 2005. Functional biodiversity of macroinvertebrate assemblages along major ecological gradients of boreal headwater streams. Freshwat. Biol., 50, 1578-1587. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Higgins M.J. and Merritt R.W., 1999. Temporary woodland ponds in Michigan. Invertebrate seasonal patterns and trophic relationships. In: Batzer D.P., Rader R.B. and Wissinger S.A. (eds.), Invertebrates in freshwater wetlands of North America: ecology and management, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 279-297. [Google Scholar]
  • IRSA-CNR, 1994. Metodi analitici per le acque, Istituto Poligrafico e Zecca dello Stato. [Google Scholar]
  • Kerans B.L. and Karr J.R., 1994. A benthic index of biotic integrity (B-IBI) for rivers of the Tennessee Valley. Ecol. Appl., 4, 768-785. [Google Scholar]
  • Lake P.S., Bayly I.A.E. and Morton D.W., 1989. The phenology of a temporary pond in Western Victoria Australia, with special reference to invertebrate succession. Arch. Hydrobiol., 115, 171-202. [Google Scholar]
  • Marengo G. and Baudo R., 1988. Forme del fosforo nei sedimenti lacustri. Acqua Aria, 6, 717-721. [Google Scholar]
  • Merritt R.W. and Cummins K.W., 1996. An introduction to the aquatic insects of North America, Kendall/Hunt, Dubuque. [Google Scholar]
  • Newman R.M., 1991. Herbivory and detritivory on freshwater macrophytes by invertebrates: a review. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc., 10, 89-114. [Google Scholar]
  • Nicolet P., Biggs J., Fox G., Hodson M.J., Reynolds C., Withfield M. and Williams P., 2004. The wetland plant and macroinvertebrate assemblages of temporary ponds in England and Wales. Biol. Conserv., 120, 265-282. [Google Scholar]
  • Nicolet P., Ruggiero A. and Biggs J., 2007. Second European Pond Workshop: Conservation of pond biodiversity in a changing European landscape. Ann. Limnol. - Int. J. Lim., 43, 77-80. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Oertli B., Joye D.A., Castella E., Juge R., Cambin D. and Lachavanne J.B., 2002. Does size matter? The relationship between pond area and biodiversity. Biol. Conserv., 104, 59-70. [Google Scholar]
  • Pardo I. and Armitage P.D., 1997. Species assemblages as descriptors of mesohabitats. Hydrobiologia, 344, 111-128. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pielou E.C., 1969. An Introduction to Mathematical Ecology, Wiley, New York. [Google Scholar]
  • Rees S.E., 1997. The historical and cultural importance of ponds and small lakes in Wales, UK. Aquat. Conserv. Mar. Freshwat. Ecosyst., 7, 133-139. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Regione Lazio, 2004. La rete natura 2000 nel Lazio. Caratterizzazione dei siti di importanza comunitaria e delle zone di protezione dell'attuazione della sottomisura. I.1.2, 2nd edn., Assessorato Ambiente, Dipartimento Territorio, Direzione Generale Ambiente e Protezione Civile: Roma. [Google Scholar]
  • Ross R.M., Lellis W.A., Bennett R.M. and Johnson C.S., 2001. Landscape determinants of nonindigenous fish invasions. Biol. Invasions, 3, 347-361. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Schneider D.W. and Frost T.M., 1996. Habitat duration and community structure in temporary ponds. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc., 15, 64-86. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Schramm H.L. Jr and Jirka K.J., 1989. Effects of aquatic macrophytes on benthic macroinvertebrates in two Florida lakes. J. Freshwat. Ecol., 5, 1-12. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Solimini A.G., Della Bella V. and Bazzanti M., 2005. Macroinvertebrate size spectra of Mediterranean ponds with differing hydroperiod length. Aquat. Conserv. Mar. Freshwat. Ecosyst., 15, 601-611. [Google Scholar]
  • Solimini A.G., Bazzanti M., Ruggiero A. and Carchini G., 2008. Developing a multimetric index of ecological integrity based on macroinvertebrates of mountain ponds in central Italy. Hydrobiologia, 597, 109-123. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sokal R.R. and Rohlf G., 1973. Introduction to biostatistic, Freeman & Co. [Google Scholar]
  • Stein K.J., Mitchell J.C., Smith E.P. and Waldon J.L., 2003. Trophic level distribution of ephemeral pool insects: uniformity among pools. J. Freshwat. Ecol., 18, 549-556. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Studinski J.M. and Grubbs S.A., 2007. Environmental factors affecting the distribution of aquatic invertebrates in temporary ponds in Mammoth Cave National Park, Kentucky, USA. Hydrobiologia, 575, 211-220. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Tockner D., Armitage P.D., Bickerton M.A. and Hall K.A., 2000. Assessing stream quality using information on mesohabitat distribution and character. Aquat. Conserv. Mar. Freshwat. Ecosyst., 10, 179-196. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Tolonen K.T., Hämäläinen H., Holopainin L.J. and Karjalainin J., 2001. Influences of habitat type and environmental variables on littoral macroinvertebrate communities in a large lake system. Arch. Hydrobiol., 152, 39-67. [Google Scholar]
  • Usseglio-Polatera P., Richoux P., Bournaud M. and Tachet H., 2001. A functional classification of benthic macroinvertebrates based on biological and ecological traits: application to river condition assessment and stream management. Arch. Hydrobiol., 139, Suppl., 53-83. [Google Scholar]
  • Vannote R.L., Minshall G.W., Cummins K.W., Sedell J.R. and Cushing C.E., 1980. The River Continuum Concept. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 37, 130-137. [Google Scholar]
  • Wetzel R.G. and Likens G.E., 2000. Limnological analyses, 3rd edn., Springer-Verlag, New York. [Google Scholar]
  • White J. and Irvine K., 2003. The use of littoral mesohabitats and their macroinvertebrate assemblages in the ecological assessment of lakes. Aquat. Conserv. Mar. Freshwat. Ecosyst., 13, 331-351. [Google Scholar]
  • Wiggins G.B., Mckay R.J. and Smith I.M., 1980. Evolutionary and ecological strategies of animals in annual temporary pools. Arch. Hydrobiol., 58, Suppl., 97-206. [Google Scholar]
  • Williams W.D., 1985. Biotic adaptation in temporary lentic waters, with special reference to those in semi-arid and arid regions. Hydrobiologia, 125, 85-110. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Williams D.D., 1987. The ecology of temporary waters, Croom Helm, London & Sydney, Timber Press, Portland. [Google Scholar]
  • Wissinger S.A., 1997. Cyclic colonization in predictably ephemeral habitats: a template for biological control in annual crop systems. Biol. Contr., 10, 4-15. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.