Phytoplankton community composition variation under natural and prolonged saline intrusion simulations

Free Access

Table 3

The result of SIMPER and ANOSIM analysis in both experiments.

Experiment 1 Simper: Overall average dissimilarity = 65.0% Anosim: R = 0.8085; P = 0.0001 (similarity index by Euclidean)

TMs	T0	T5	T10	T15	T20	T25	T30	T32
T0		D: 70.6% R: 1 P: 0.1039	D: 81.7% R: 1 P: 0.0965	D: 82.4% R: 1 P: 0.1008	D: 93.3% R: 1 P: 0.1030	D: 80.8% R: 1 P: 0.0992	D: 81.9% R: 1 P: 0.0963	D: 68.8% R: 1 P: 0.1034
T5	D: 70.6% R: 1 P: 0.1039		D: 45.3% R: 1 P: 0.1035	D:50.2% R: 0.9259 P: 0.0967	D: 97.1% R: 1 P: 0.1009	D: 59.4% R: 0.9259 P: 0.0996	D: 78.9% R: 1 P: 0.1039	D: 79.3% R: 1 P: 0.0973
T10	D: 81.7% R: 1 P: 0.0965	D: 45.3% R: 1 P: 0.1035		D: 21.4% R: −0.2222 P: 0.297	D: 91.9% R: 1 P: 0.0945	D: 33.2% R: 0.7778 P: 0.1004	D: 50.1% R: 1 P: 0.0988	D: 57.5% R: 1 P: 0.0986
T15	D: 82.4% R: 1 P: 0.1008	D: 50.2% R: 0.9259 P: 0.0967	D: 21.4% R: −0.2222 P: 0.297		D: 92.1% R: 0.8889 P: 0.096	D: 27.7% R: 0.3704 P: 0.0983	D: 53.4% R: 0.6667 P: 0.1011	D: 57.2% R: 0.8889 P: 0.1004
T20	D: 93.3% R: 1 P: 0.103	D: 97.1% R: 1 P: 0.1009	D: 91.9% R: 1 P: 0.0945	D: 92.1% R: 0.8889 P: 0.096		D: 86.5% R: 1 P: 0.1011	D: 72.5% R: 1 P: 0.0964	D: 77.1% R: 1 P: 0.1029
T25	D: 80.8% R: 1 P: 0.0992	D: 59.4% R: 0.9259 P: 0.0996	D: 33.2% R: 0.7778 P: 0.1004	D: 27.7% R: 0.3704 P: 0.0983	D: 86.5% R: 1 P: 0.1011		D: 37.8% R: 1 P: 0.0999	D: 46.8% R: 1 P: 0.0988
T30	D: 81.9% R: 1 P: 0.0963	D: 78.9% R: 1 P: 0.1039	D: 56.1% R: 1 P: 0.0988	D: 53.4% R: 0.6667 P: 0.1011	D: 72.5% R: 1 P: 0.0964	D: 37.8% R: 1 P: 0.0999		D: 39.1% R: 1 P: 0.1051
T32	D: 68.8% R: 1 P: 0.1034	D: 79.3% R: 1 P: 0.0973	D: 57.5% R: 1 P: 0.0986	D: 57.2% R: 0.8889 P: 0.1004	D: 77.1% R: 1 P: 0.1029	D: 46.8% R: 1 P: 0.0988	D: 39.1% R: 1 P: 0.1051
Experiment 2 Simper: Overall average dissimilarity = 73.9% Anosim: R = 0.7827; P = 0.0001 (similarity index by Euclidean)
TMs	T0	T5	T10	T15	T20	T25	T30	T32
T0		D: 70.5% R: 0.6667 P: 0.0995	D: 81.3% R: 0.6667 P: 0.1002	D: 90.5% R: 0.6667 P: 0.0993	D: 90.1% R: 0.6667 P: 0.1018	D: 83.6% R: 0.6667 P: 0.0969	D: 92.3% R: 0.6667 P: 0.1047	D: 83.8% R: 0.6667 P: 0.0975
T5	D: 70.5% R: 0.6667 P: 0.0995		D: 80.5% R: 1 P: 0.1014	D:84.0% R: 1 P: 0.1015	D: 89.3% R: 1 P: 0.1008	D: 82.8% R: 1 P: 0.1061	D: 87.2% R: 1 P: 0.1002	D: 69.3% R: 1 P: 0.0981
T10	D: 81.3% R: 0.6667 P: 0.1002	D: 80.5% R: 1 P: 0.1014		D: 68.5% R: 1 P: 0.0962	D: 79.6% R: 1 P: 0.1022	D: 72.1% R: 1 P: 0.0976	D: 68.0% R: 1 P: 0.1005	D: 75.3% R: 1 P: 0.1021
T15	D: 90.5% R: 0.6667 P: 0.0993	D: 84.0% R: 1 P: 0.1015	D: 68.5% R: 1 P: 0.0962		D: 50.7% R: 1 P: 0.1039	D: 53.9% R: 1 P: 0.096	D: 68.6% R: 1 P: 0.0999	D: 67.9% R: 1 P: 0.1025
T20	D: 90.1% R: 0.6667 P: 0.1018	D: 89.3% R: 1 P: 0.1008	D: 79.6% R: 1 P: 0.1022	D: 50.7% R: 1 P: 0.1039		D: 56.0% R: 1 P: 0.0971	D: 76.4% R: 1 P: 0.0996	D: 76.6% R: 1 P: 0.0993
T25	D: 83.6 R: 0.6667 P: 0.0969	D: 82.8% R: 1 P: 0.1061	D: 72.1% R: 1 P: 0.0976	D: 53.9% R: 1 P: 0.096	D: 56.0% R: 1 P: 0.0971		D: 61.9% R: 1 P: 0.0934	D: 41.0% R: 1 P: 0.0993
T30	D: 92.3% R: 0.6667 P: 0.1047	D: 87.2% R: 1 P: 0.1002	D: 68.0% R: 1 P: 0.1005	D: 68.6% R: 1 P: 0.0999	D: 76.4% R: 1 P: 0.0996	D: 61.9% R: 1 P: 0.0934		D: 67.5% R: 1 P: 0.1011
T32	D: 83.8% R: 0.6667 P: 0.0975	D: 69.3% R: 1 P: 0.0981	D: 75.3% R: 1 P: 0.1021	D: 67.9% R: 1 P: 0.1025	D: 76.6% R: 1 P: 0.0993	D: 41.0% R: 1 P: 0.0993	D: 67.5% R: 1 P: 0.1011

Note: TMs: treatments; D: Overall average dissimilarity from SIMPER test (distance/similarity measure by Bray-Curtis); R: R values from ANOSIM test; P: p-values, uncorrected significance (from ANOSIM).

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.