Free Access
Issue
Ann. Limnol. - Int. J. Lim.
Volume 46, Number 4, 2010
Page(s) 241 - 247
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/limn/2010022
Published online 25 October 2010
  • Adamczuk M., 2009. Predation follows competition in depth selection behaviour of Cladocera in a deep lake. Biological lett., 46, 31–38. [Google Scholar]
  • Boeing W.J., Ramcharan C.W. and Riessen P., 2006. Multiple predator defence strategies in Daphnia pulex and their relation to native habitat. J. Plankton Res., 28, 571–584. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Boersma M., 1995. Competition in natural populations of Daphnia. Oecologia, 103, 309–318. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Brabrand Å., Faaefing B. and Nilssen J.T., 1986. Juvenile roach and invertebrate predators: delaying the recovery phase of eutrophic lakes by suppression of efficient filter-feeders. J. Fish Biol., 29, 99–106. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Brooks J.L. and Dodson S.I., 1965. Predation, body-size and composition of plankton. Science, 150, 28–35. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Czernaś K. and Serafin A., 2007. Changes in phytoplankton productivity in the pelagic zone of the mesotrophic Piaseczno lake in 1987–1989 and 2001–2003. Oceanol. Hydrobiol. Stud., 36, suppl. 1, 209–212. [Google Scholar]
  • DeMott W.R. and Kerfoot W.C., 1982. Competition among cladocerans: nature of the interaction between Bosmina and Daphnia. Ecology, 63, 1949–1966. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Dodson S.I., 1972. Mortality in a population of Daphnia rosea. Ecology, 53, 1011–1023. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gabriel W., 1982. Modelling reproductive strategies of Daphnia. Arch. Hydrobiol., 95, 69–80. [Google Scholar]
  • Gliwicz Z.M. and Boavida J.M., 1996. Clutch size and body size at first reproduction in Daphnia pulicaria at different levels of food and predation. J. Plankton Res., 18, 863–880. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gliwicz Z.M. and Pijanowska J., 1989. The role of predation in zooplankton succession. In: Sommer U. (ed.), Plankton Ecology – Succession in Plankton Communities, Springer Verlag, New York-Berlin-Heidelberg, 253–296. [Google Scholar]
  • Goulden C.E., Henry L.L. and Tessier A.J., 1982. Body size, energy reserves, and competitive ability in three species of Cladocera. Ecology, 63, 1780–1789. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hall D.J., 1964. An experimental approach to the dynamics of a natural population of Daphnia Galeata Mendotae. Ecology, 45, 94–112. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hall D.J., Threlkeld S.T., Burns C.W. and Crowley P.H., 1976. The size-efficiency hypothesis and the size structure of zooplankton communities. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Systemat., 7, 177–208. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hanazato T. and Yasumo M., 1989. Zooplankton community structure driven by vertebrate and invertebrate predators. Oecologia, 81, 450–458. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hawkins P. and Lampert W., 1989. The effect of Daphnia body size on filtering rate inhibition in the presence of filamentous cyanobacterium. Limnol. Oceanogr., 34, 1084–1089. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Herzig A., 1995. Leptodora kindtii: efficient predator and preferred prey item in a Neusiedler See, Austria. Hydrobiologia, 307, 273–282. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Herzig A. and Auer B. 1990. The feeding behaviour of Leptodora kindtii and its impact on the zooplankton community in Neusiedler See (Austria). Hydrobiologia, 198, 107–117. [Google Scholar]
  • Hovenkamp W., 1990. Instar-specific mortalities of coexisting Daphnia species in relation to food and invertebrate predation. J. Plankton Res., 12, 483–495. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Jacobs J., 1974. Quantitative measurement of food selection. Oecologia, 14, 413–417. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Karabin A., 1974. Studies on the predatory role of the cladoceran, Leptodora kindtii (Focke), in secondary production of two lakes with different trophy. Ekol. pol., 22, 295–310. [Google Scholar]
  • Kerfoot W.C., 1980. Commentary: transparency, body-size and prey conspicuousness. In: Kerfoot W.C. (ed.), Evolution and Ecology of Zooplankton Communities, The University Press of New England, Hannover, 609–617. [Google Scholar]
  • Kerfoot W.C., DeMott W.R. and De Angelis D.L., 1985. Interactions among cladocerans: food limitation and exploitative competition. Arch. Hydrobiol., 21, 431–451. [Google Scholar]
  • Korovchinsky N.M., 2000. Species richness of pelagic Cladocera of large lakes in the eastern hemisphere. Hydrobiologia, 434, 41–54. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lane P.A., 1979. Vertebrate and invertebrate predation intensity of freshwater zooplankton communities. Nature, 280, 391–393. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Lazzaro X., 1987. A review of planktivorous fishes: Their evolution, feeding behaviors, selectivities and impacts. Hydrobiologia, 146, 97–167. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lunte C.C. and Luecke C., 1990. Trophic interactions of Leptodora in lake Mendota. Limnol. Oceanogr., 35, 1091–1100. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Matveev V.F., 1987. Effect of competition on the demography of planktonic cladocerans – Daphnia and Diaphanosoma. Oecologia, 74, 468–477. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Pastorok R.A., 1980. Selection of prey by Chaoborus larvae: a review and new evidence o behavioral flexibility. In: Kerfoot W.C. (ed.), Evolution and ecology of zooplankton communities, The University Press of New England, Hannover, 538–554. [Google Scholar]
  • Patalas K., 1954. Pelagic crustacean complexes of 28 Pommeranian lakes. Ekol. pol., 2, 61–92. [Google Scholar]
  • Pijanowska J., 1990. Cyclomorphosis in Daphnia: an adaptation to avoid invertebrate predation. Hydrobiologia, 198, 41–50. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Riessen H.P., 1984. The other side of cyclomorphosis: why Daphnia lose their helmets. Limnol. Oceanogr., 29, 1123–1127. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Smith D.W. and Cooper S.D., 1982. Competition among Cladocera. Ecology, 63, 1004–1015. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Stearns S.C., 1992. The evolution of life histories, Oxford University, 249 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Stibor H. and Lampert W., 1993. Estimating the size at maturity in field populations of Daphnia galeata (Cladocera). Freshwat. Biol., 30, 433–438. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Šramek-Hušek R., Straškraba M. and Brtek J., 1962. Lupenonozci – Branchiopoda, Fauna CSSR, 16, Praha, 470 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Vanni M.J., 1986. Competition in zooplankton communities: suppression of small species by Daphnia pulex. Limnol. Oceanogr., 31, 1039–1056. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wojtal A., Frankiewicz P. and Zalewski M., 1999. The role of the invertebrate predator Leptodora kindtii in the trophic cascade of a lowland reservoir. Hydrobiologia, 416, 215–223. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wojtal A., Bogusz D., Menshutkin V., Izydorczyk K., Frankiewicz P., Wagner-Lotkowska I. and Zalewski M., 2008. A study of Daphnia-Leptodora-juvenile Percids interactions using a mathematical model in the biomanipulated Sulejow Reservoir. Ann. Limnol. - Int. J. Lim., 44, 7–23. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Wright D.J., 1965. The population dynamics and production of Daphnia in Canyon Ferry Reservoir, Montana. Limnol. Oceanogr., 10, 583–590. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Zaret T.M. and Kerfoot W.C., 1975. Fish predation on Bosmina longirostris: body size selection versus visibility selection. Ecology, 56, 232–237. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.